Pretty Cool
I hope he builds a nest in my trees. That would be neat, and maybe it would qualify me for some sweet government cash for watching its back or something!!
I wonder what they taste like...?
(Just kidding, lighten up!)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the blog of a truly conservative/libertarian UAW member. Conservative UAW member is not an oxymoron. I hate liberalism, but only because liberalism is inherently evil. Please note: This is a generally HUMOROUS site (or that's the goal, anyway). It is also for rants and gun stuff. Please don't get all offended. If you do, you're intolerant; get diversity training! CHECK ARCHIVES FOR OLDER STUFF!!
Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it
is a dangerous servant and a fearful master. - George Washington
When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it
spreads. - Ron Paul
"I think we have more machinery of government than is necessary, too
many parasites living on the labor of the industrious." -- Thomas
Jefferson
“But whether the resistance against government tyrants is non-violent or
physically violent, the effort to overthrow state oppression qualifies as true patriotism.” - Ron Paul
"Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car
keys to teenage boys."
P.J. O'Rourke
No More Free Wacos: An Explication of the Obvious Addressed to Eric Holder, Attorney General of the United States.
Explication - noun; the act of making clear or removing obscurity from the meaning of a word, symbol or expression. -- Webster's Dictionary.
5 May 2009
Dear Eric,
I believe I'm entitled to use your first name, since you have expressed an interest in circumscribing my liberty and seizing my personal property, to wit, three heretofore legal semi-automatic rifles of military utility (mistakenly dubbed "assault rifles"). Anyone who wants to do something so personal and intimate as to commit premeditated theft upon you need not be given any honorifics, don't you agree? I mean, if a street thug announces that he wishes to rob you, there is no need to address him as "Sir" this or "Mister" that. Why should rapacious government thieves who announce their intentions so boldly be treated any differently? If you are offended by the fact that you are unused to being addressed in this manner, I can only say that you are not as offended as I am at the prospect of your administration trying to steal my property and liberty.
But, that is not why I write you today. No, I received what I believe to be a credible report this afternoon about someone whom the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives views as a real thorn in their side. The substance of the report has it that you, or someone in your office, has, in reference to this friend of mine, muttered something very much like the following:
"What miserable drones and traitors have I nurtured and promoted in my household who let their lord be treated with such shameful contempt by a low-born cleric! . . . Will no one rid me of this troublesome priest?"
That, of course, was Henry the Second speaking of the Archbishop of Canterbury, Thomas Becket, in the year of our Lord 1170.
Shortly thereafter, four of Henry's knights, Reginald Fitzurse, Hugh de Moreville, William de Tracy, and Richard le Breton entered Canterbury Cathedral, and hacked Becket to death with swords, scattering his brains on the floor. "Let us go," said one, "this fellow will not be getting up again."
That political murder had great consequences for Henry, and he regretted it the rest of his long reign.
But enough of Henry. Let's talk about the alleged threat. I am sure that this is a base canard, something attributed to you by someone who just wishes to make trouble. However, as it happens, this is not the first time, or even the second, that I have heard such threats attributed to your department since the election.
Yet, surely, such an educated man as yourself would not make King Henry's mistake. However, it seems likely that it did come out of your department, so let us say that in some perverted attempt to convey a threat to "this troublesome priest" one of your subordinates actually uttered it. Let us say, for purposes of hypothetical argument, that it is in some sense, true.
I know how agencies can spin out of control if not properly guided by upper management. So do you. I'm sure that you saw the television images out of Texas on 28 February and 19 April 1993. I think you would agree with me that neither of those days likely represented the official policy of the Clinton administration. Yet, they happened.
Subsequent to that, citizens formed self-defense militias, millions more of your hated "assault weapons" were imported and sold before the ban and we spent the next seven years staring uneasily at one another, waiting for the next government-issue bloody shoe to drop. Oh, yes, and your party lost control of the Congress, with even President Clinton blaming it on the passage of the Brady Bill and the Assault Weapons Ban. The Law of Unintended Consequences sure sucks, doesn't it?
But, the other shoe didn't drop.
Yet, there's something you should understand about that whole process. As an amateur historian and keen observer of current affairs I can see it without difficulty.
You only get one free Waco.
If the statistics on the sales of firearms and ammunition tell you anything, you ought to understand that the same dynamic is at work now and yet from your point of view you haven't DONE anything to deserve it. Oh, you've muttered occasional threats to reinstate the Assault Weapons Ban, but no one believes politicians when they speak anyway.
So why, you may ask yourself, is this happening?
Like I said, Eric, you only get one free Waco. It was your original sin. The botched raid, the massacre, the cover-ups, we've been through them already. You may remember that no one was held to account for that -- not very reassuring to the citizenry. And if, as is apparent, someone in the Department of Justice hasn't learned the lessons of the first Waco, we, the millions of "bitter clingers" out here in fly-over country, have. We have no reason to be trusting of your motives. For we, and you, have been here before.
So, let me explicate the obvious: There are no do-overs, not when it comes to your employees killing American citizens for bad reasons. Look around, count the guns, estimate the billions of rounds of small arms ammunition in private hands, and consider that the latest Janet has already declared most of the rest of us, including veterans, "domestic terrorists" anyway. Do you think we have not noticed? Do you think we do not remember the misdeeds of the last administration you were a part of?
In addition, recent government misconduct -- bureaucratic, legal and judicial -- in the Wayne Fincher and David Olofson cases (the same kind of chicanery that rightly caused you to overturn the conviction of Alaska Senator Ted Stevens) has convinced many of us that there is no percentage in betting on a fair trial if the ATF sets their sights on us and we are not part of the Mandarin class.
If we are no longer under the rule of constitutional law but are merely subject to irreversible bureaucratic diktat and we do not fancy being railroaded in a patently unfair federal trial where expert witnesses are denied access to evidence, then our options when approached by ATF agents are rather limited. It is plain, in the absence of the right of a fair trial, that a target of ATF investigation has little to lose by resorting to the right of an unfair gunfight. This may be an unintended consequence of those cases. It is nonetheless real.
Wake up and smell what your administration is shoveling from downwind, where we are forced to stand. And please understand the predicament you've put yourselves in by your present and former bad behavior.
There will be no more free Wacos.
Please, for all our sakes, counsel your employees, who apparently seek to curry your favor by misquoting you, that replicating 1993 is neither good policy nor is it your intention. We don't need any more itchy trigger fingers in this country.
And Eric, not to put too fine a point on it, but you and I both can make an educated guess about what mischief will likely ensue if ANY high-profile Second Amendment activist "has an accident". Best to tell your lads and lasses to stick to those nice safe paper cases (you know, the ones with the 4473s completed with a "Y", rather than "yes") and confine their wet-work fantasies to their off-duty reading. There's still lots of vicious drug gangs, murderous career criminals and real terrorists out there to keep them busy without picking a fight with honest American gunowners who merely want to be left alone.
Thank you for your kind attention in this matter. I wish you a nice, full and safe term of office. Really.
Mike Vanderboegh
PO Box 926
Pinson, AL 35126
GeorgeMason1776@aol.com
sipseystreetirregulars.blogspot.com
(A distribution note to Three Percenters: Cast this one far and wide, folks. I have been told we need to make sure that the adults in the permanent bureaucracy exercise some control over their temporary charges, no matter how short-sighted, immature and petulant the Obamakiddies seem to be. The children are on the playground with loaded firearms, playing with societal forces they scarcely understand. Of course, this is putting the very nicest face possible on such potentially deadly behavior. Do I think it will work? Unlikely, but we have to try anyway.)
| CLASS ONE: Rimfire, Open/Iron Sights | ||||||
| Shooter | Firearm | Distance | Class | 1 Hand | 2 Hand | Total |
| Xav92p | Browning, Buckmark, semi-auto, 22LR, 5" barrel | 25' | 1 | 50 | 59 | 109 |
| TrueBlueSam | Ruger Single Six 22LR | 25' | 1 | 68 | 49 | 117 |
| BillH | Hi-Standard GB 22LR | 25' | 1 | 63 | 67 | 130 |
| Danno | Ruger 22/45 22LR | 25' | 1 | 68 | 72 | 140 |
CLASS TWO: Rimfire, with Optics | ||||||
| Shooter | Firearm | Distance | Class | 1 Hand | 2 Hand | Total |
| Mr. Completely | High Standard | 25' | 2 | 50 | 15 | 65 |
| jimmyb | Ruger MKII Eotech site Volquartsen grips/trigger | 25' | 2 | 28 | 37 | 65 |
| CLASS THREE: Centerfire, Open/Iron Sights | ||||||
| Shooter | Firearm | Distance | Class | 1 Hand | 2 Hand | Total |
| BillH |
| 25' | 3 | 48 | 62 | 65 |
| Azreel | FN 5.7 | 25' | 3 | 57 | 58 | 115 |
| Azreel | Para-Ordnance P14-45 45ACP | 25' | 3 | 61 | 63 | 124 |
| Ryadmere | Para-Ordnance P14-45 45ACP | 25' | 3 | 63 | 79 | 142 |
| CLASS FOUR: Centerfire, with Optics | ||||||
| Shooter | Firearm | Distance | Class | 1 Hand | 2 Hand | Total |
| Azreel | Ruger Redhawk .44 Mag | 25' | 4 | 60 | 67 | 127 |
| CLASS FIVE: Other OMG!!! | ||||||
| Shooter | Firearm | Distance | Class | 1 Hand? | 2 Hand? | Total |
| Billll | The Billll Pedal Gun! | 30' | 4 | 68 | 67 | 135 |

OK I'm late. Last month didn't work out well for me including badVery cool. And Billll, remind me never to piss you off...
weather, and the loss of about 1/2" off the end of my usual trigger
finger, so I decided I needed some humor.
This entry is Class 5, "other". Very much other.
The gun is a pedal-powered air gun made from an exercise bicycle and an
air compressor head, with a 1" barrel about 4 ft long.
The projectiles are made from spent 12ga shotgun shells with a 1/4"
screw placed through the primer hole, and ground to a point. The open
end of the shell was flared slightly to aid stability. Who knows, it may
have worked.
The course was fired at 10 yards, and 20 PSI. This sounds like awfully
low pressure, but if you get much higher, the projectiles will go
completely through the backstop, leaving a very neat 1" hole in wood up
to 1/2" chipboard.
In my back yard, I call this a kids toy. In your back yard, I hope your
kids are more than 1/4 mile away. :-)
Billll
Fully loaded it weighs in at 81oz. After the first 3-4 shots it becomes frustratingly difficult to hold that sucker without shaking like an aspen leaf in a stiff breeze. While the shots on the two handed target were much better grouped (I wasted all 8 shots trying to get that one dang -1) I still managed to hit all around it but never in it. I shall name this target "Frustration".I feel your pain, Azreel. They're still cool guns, though!
Ryadmere is a buddy of mine, an active duty Marine who is new to theRemember, Ryadamere - IT'S JUST AN INTERNET CONTEST!!
postal match concept. He insists this whole "target pistol" thing is
horribly unfair and would like to remark that he's much better with man
sized targets that shoot back.
Hello, i present a french contribution to the debt reduction, oups!!!!I may have lost something in translation (fir?), but am tickled that we have international players on the shoot!!
It's my second E postal match participation, the first time last month I practice throughout the years the centerfire pistol and revolver in steel challenge and fun fir
Swine Flu Could Become More Dangerous
The swine flu virus that has killed more than 80 people in Mexico may mutateinto
a "more dangerous" strain, the World Health Organisation has warned.
Missing Killer Flu Virus Sample Count Not Clear: CDC
THURSDAY, April 21(HealthDay News) -- As many as a couple of dozen test
kits containing a deadlyflu virus still have not been rounded up and destroyed
in the United States,government health officials said Thursday.
Deadly Pathogens MayHave Gone Missing At Fort Detrick, Maryland
2009-04-22 19:57:53
Fort Detrick's infectious disease laboratory in Frederick, Maryland, isunder
investigation by the Army's Criminal Investigation Command for thepossible
disappearance of some of its stock of deadly pathogens, officials forthe Army
and the lab said today.
No Criminal Misconduct Found In Case Of Missing Army Vials
John 2:13-22
13And the Jews' passover was at hand, and Jesus went up to Jerusalem.14And found in the temple those that sold oxen and sheep and doves, and the changers of money sitting:
15And when he had made a scourge of small cords, he drove them all out of the temple, and the sheep, and the oxen; and poured out the changers' money, and overthrew the tables;
16And said unto them that sold doves, Take these things hence; make not my Father's house an house of merchandise.
17And his disciples remembered that it was written, The zeal of thine house hath eaten me up.
18Then answered the Jews and said unto him, What sign shewest thou unto us, seeing that thou doest these things?
19Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.
20Then said the Jews, Forty and six years was this temple in building, and wilt thou rear it up in three days?
21But he spake of the temple of his body.
22When therefore he was risen from the dead, his disciples remembered that he had said this unto them; and they believed the scripture, and the word which Jesus had said.
Rejoice today.
And remember the rules...
John 13:34 "A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. 35By this all men will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another."
Liberalism, like second-wave feminism, seems to have become a new religion for those who profess contempt for religion. It has been reduced to an elitist set of rhetorical formulas, which posit the working class as passive, mindless victims in desperate need of salvation by the state. Individual rights and free expression, which used to be liberal values, are being gradually subsumed to worship of government power.